A couple of days ago, I wrote how shortsighted internet columnists were playing up the "Weis and Willingham were both 11-4" angle. The attached article is a definitive answer as to why this argument is total BS. Enjoy.
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
I'm just waiting for when we suck next year due to a lack of upperclassmen.
The short-sighted folks (John Saunders, etc) will say that Weis' record for year 3 was bad, so thus he should be sh!tcanned in the same manner at Ty Willie.
The practical folks will say that Charlie's playing 7-card stud with only 4 cards due to Ty's lack of recruiting efforts.
Here's hoping that the classes of '11 and '12 will step up as Frosh & Sophs next year!
1 comment:
I'm just waiting for when we suck next year due to a lack of upperclassmen.
The short-sighted folks (John Saunders, etc) will say that Weis' record for year 3 was bad, so thus he should be sh!tcanned in the same manner at Ty Willie.
The practical folks will say that Charlie's playing 7-card stud with only 4 cards due to Ty's lack of recruiting efforts.
Here's hoping that the classes of '11 and '12 will step up as Frosh & Sophs next year!
Post a Comment